🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives buried in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to decide how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to serve as their last home, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of treasures. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper killed while working overseas. His parent said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his permanent resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb current plots. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to proceed for now. Others argue the moment for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

It was also stated there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. We need productive local conversations to find the appropriate solutions for each village.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of hallowed earth.